Most of the people appointed by six local governments and four Chambers of Commerce to the steering committee for the Heart of the Triad project attended our Wednesday morning meeting to find out exactly what they will be expected to do. Members received a lot of background information about the concept and made several decisions about the committee itself.
Paul Norby, Forsyth County Planning Director, started off with a summary of how we got to this point. At a meeting at Kerner's Folly in April 2004, planners from the six jurisdictions were asked to scope out the current conditions and land uses. PART staff coordinated this effort that resulted in a series of maps depicting governmental jurisdictions, infrastucture currently in place, and land use plans for the area. The planners discovered that this area is "on the edge of everyone's radar screens" with no real plans or coordination, and if things continued in this mode, the area will likely develop with low density residential uses on large lots and some scattered warehouse-type businesses.
Once these preliminary findings were formally presented to the local governments, they agreed to work together in a regional planning effort to identify a plan that would enhance the region but not compete with individual county's and city's efforts within their own jurisdictions. PART was able to access $200,000 in state planning money, and the four Chambers of Commerce became the champions to raise the required $200,000 in matching local funds. This money is being used to fund a study conducted by HDR to examine the market place to see what "fits," develop a land use plan, identify the needed infrastructure (roads, water, sewer, etc.) and recommend a management structure to oversee it - all in the hopes of generating quality economic growth and jobs. The role of this steering committee is to guide and advise this study, be a cheerleader for the project, and present the final recommendations to the six local governments for their possible adoption and implementation.
David Jameson of the Greensboro Chamber of Commerce noted that this gathering was "not just a meeting, but a moment in history" where the various jurisdictions were demonstrating "the power of working together." He cited a need for "transformational leadership" with people being willing to do things differently to create this "legacy project."
He then reported on the successful fundraising effort with the $200,000 raised in 30 days by asking six businesses and getting six "yeses," "the easiest sell in [his] career" due to the high support for this project. BB&T, Time-Warner, and Duke Power contributed $50,000 each with Piedmont Natural Gas, Wachovia, and the Piedmont Triad Partnership giving the rest. He requested that at least the top three contributors, and preferably all six, be granted membership on the steering committee. Later in the meeting, committee members voted to add one member each from the top three.
Brent McKinney, PART's executive director, gave an overview of the Triad region's growth and commuting patterns. Our current growth rate is 1.8% but that is expected to increase significantly. One problem identified in the planners' study was that of the road network in this Heart of the Triad - there are plenty of roads "to" the area, but few roads for internal circulation "in" the area.
David Tayor from HDR discussed the study process and timeline. It will be an intense effort with a lot of public input including numerous hearings and a 5.5-day planning charette. He noted that guiding principles would be "place making," complementary not competitive, and maximize investment. Information and progress will be posted on the PART website.
Brent McKinney then outlined the expectation for the committee - to provide general oversight of the planning process. It was noted that the committee has no bylaws, no money, and no power to do anything. A plan will be recommended to the six local governments, and it will have to be acceptable to ALL of them in order for the project to move forward. A technical committee composed of planners and transportation professionals will advise on technical aspects of the study.
After all that education and "getting up to speed," it was finally time to make some decisions about the committee itself. It was agreed to add three members representing the top contributors in the fundraising effort, a member from the Piedmont Triad Airport Authority, a member of the Forsyth County Utilities Commission, and a member from the High Point Furniture Market Authority. A request from a resident of the nearby area to have at least two residents on this committee was rejected by committee members, with the reasoning being that the elected officials serving on this committee already represent those interests.
Due to my position as chairman of the PART Board of Trustees, I had been serving as the "default" presider at Heart of the Triad meetings up to this point. It was decided to appoint co-chairs, one from Forsyth and one from Guilford. Former Greensboro City Councilmember Robbie Perkins and Kernersville Chamber of Commerce representative Arnold King were elected to those positions. There was quite a bit of discussion about both men being in the real estate development business, but both assured the group they had no holdings in the area or conflicts of interest. Since the final decision-making power rests with the local governments, not this committee, members decided this should not be a problem and it would be a plus to have persons who are so familiar with land development process chairing the effort.
The committee will start out meeting monthly and will meet more often if and when the need arises. It is going to be an intense process that could eventually shape the future of this 7500 acres of land in the Heart of the Triad.
Wednesday, December 07, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
"A request from a resident of the nearby area to have at least two residents on this committee was rejected by committee members, with the reasoning being that the elected officials serving on this committee already represent those interests."
Yet, businesses were allowed to buy their way onto the committee, even though they too, presumably, are represented by the elected officials already serving on the committee.
Expect resistance to whatever recommendations this committee comes up with -- not because the "nay-sayers" will surface, but because the committee is a clique, with participation up for sale.
Sandy, don't you think that giving seats on the board to the biggest contributors (highest bidders?) is, at the very least, unseemly?
BB&T and Time-Warner stand to profit handsomely from development in the area.
And what if the Heart of the Triad wants to do all-wireless networking (which seems like a very good idea)? Will Time-Warner oppose the move because they might lose RoadRunner broadband revenue?
And as to the idea of elected officials representing the citizens in the area, well, they also represent the businesses. And if an elected official has to chose between representing the interests of residents and those of BB&T, Time-Warner, and Duke Power...
With the a bank and two utility companies in the driver's seat, don't you think that they will guide development in a way that's best for them, and not necessarily for everyone else?
I'm not sure that the part about no conflict of interest is true. NAI Maxwell has signs in & around Colfax, for example at the I-40/SandyRidgeRd exit. Robbie may not have "holdings" per se, but he seems to have an interest in selling land in the area.
Greetings from "the resident" who made the request to the committee to have residents be invited to join. I see now that if I only had $50,000 to donate than I could gotten a seat at the table.
The real question is, with a committee of 21 and counting, what could it HURT to include two residents? What are you all really afraid of?
I'm so tired of all of you saying you listen to the people and represent the people. You don't. You only represent developers and big business. Its the TRUE American way, isn't it?
Am I bitter? You bet!
-Mary Fabrizio, Colfax
Roch,
Greetings from the NLC conference -- saw the computers and just couldn't walk past without checking my blog. Guess that means I'm REALLY hooked!
I agree, the perception and buy-in is not going to be good with these actions, in my opinion.
David,
Excellent points! The saving grace in all this is that this committee has no power except to guide the consultant in the study. The ultimate power lies with the six local governments who will have either buy in or reject the recommendations.
Mark
Members of the committee specifically questioned Robbie (and Arnold King) on that very point, and they both stated they had no conflicts.
Mary,
I understand your disappointment. I agree with you, and for the record, supported your request but was out-voted.
I fail to see how PART has the authority to conduct this study. As I understand it, this study is a land use planning study, not a transportation development study.
Perhaps you can explain to those of use who live in "the heart of the triad" how PART interprets Section 160A-638 of the North Carolina General Statues to give it this authority. When I read the statue, I see "promoting the development of sound transportation systems" but nothing about performing land use planning for future zoning and economic develoment.
It appears to me that PART has far outstreached it's authority in chairing and funding this study. The fact that residents of the affected areas are not permitted to participate only further reinforces the apparent illegitmacy of this activity.
The irony of this matter is it reminds me of one of the issues at the heart of the American Revolution-taxation without representation. Have our local governments forgotten the principles that make us Americans?
Mac Bradley,
PART did not initiate the Heart of the Triad idea - the concept began officially with that April 2004 of various local governments at Koerner's Folly. At that time, the planning directors of all the jurisdictions were directed by those governments to conduct a preliminary study. Since all those governments were already members of PART and those planners already were working closely and advising PART activities, those governments asked PART staff to coordinate those meetings.
PART has never had any authority over this proposal but has merely convened and coordinated various meetings (that's why I called myself the "default" presider as no one ever officially designated me as such). The "authority" to conduct this study rests with the six local governments, approved in an official resolution adopted by each of those jurisdictions, not PART; PART is merely coordinating it at the direction of those local governments. The recently appointed steering committee is in charge of directing the study now.
Through a MOU (Memorandum of Understanding)among the jurisdictions, PART has designated by local governments as the agency to cordinate "regionally significant transportation projects" that cross jurisdictional boundaries - the potential road projects in this area are certainly "regionally significant projects." The state money PART was able to access is for transportation study and planning purposes.
A significant factor in transportation planning involves examination of likely land uses in the area in order to intelligently determine how much traffic would be on a road, what type of road it should be, etc. So an examination of land uses is certainly necessary and appropriate.
Sandy,
Thank you for your explaination. I find it interesting that you justify this work as a transportation project when it has clearly been identified in public as economic development/land use planning. Making sure the roads are there to meet the future development needs is unusually insightful for any government.
I would like to obtain a copy of the contract and statement of work with HDR to see if the project demands support your interpretations.
How can I obtain a copy?
Perhaps you can email me a copy to macbradley_earthlink.net
Best regards,
Mac
Mac,
That contract has not yet been finalized or signed since PART staff is still working out some bugs in it. So HDR is working on a "wing and a promise" at this time. Once it is finalized, you should be able to get a copy of it from the PART office (662-0002) since it would be public record. I'm the one who has to officially sign it, so I'll let you know when that has been done. I do not have electronic access to it to be able to email it.
Post a Comment